Friend/foe individual writers on Hacker News
It's nicely symmetrical, because conversely I prefer my LLM-generated code to have no dependencies.view on HN →
I agree with you about the bits I know anything about, and the rest sounds likely.It just makes a significant difference when the context is a Show HN and the critical comment is at the top. If it is comment (say) #13 in a varied conversation, that comes across differently. This is more the fault of upvotes, as I mentioned, but it's hard to address those directly.view on HN →
That is complete nonsense, indicative of your lack of knowledge, and utterly typical of crypto hype: mendacious or ignorant or both.The State Machine Replication problem in distributed computing has been studied since the 1960s or so, and indeed can be solved using Byzantine Broadcast. That has been solved for various settings:* Permissioned (+ PKI), synchronous: SMR possible for any f (Dolev Strong 1983)* Permissioned (no PKI), synchronous: SMR impossible if f≥n/3 (PSL 1980, FLM 1985)* Permissiview on HN →
> The idea has always been met with negativity, IMO because people want to feel that they have a part of themselves that is beyond nature and has a "special" place in the universe.This is actually a big part of why being pro-AI is met with negativity today.As someone who's using and building with AI and also experiences the "anti" movement, you've chosen a pretty condescending minority of the reasons why they dislike AI and painted it as the default."They never liked AI because they don't likeview on HN →
It's not a cheap shot at all. OP is asking why the government is using tax payer money to finance air shows instead of healthcare, regardless of free markets and business regulations. In fact, there could be less air shows (and thus less aircraft losses) and lower taxes.view on HN →
I think they absolutely are more connected than you think. So many problems in our current society are because everything is treated as being in its own vacuum.As an American, I’m tired of comments like yours. I’m not sure you understand what a cheap shot is. America isn’t on the ground while others are standing over them, kicking them. If anything, America is acting as if its limbs are all completely different organisms. The arm shooting the leg is certainly the leg’s problem, not the arm’s. /sview on HN →
That's about the same amount as any other beginner hobby. Welcome to being an adult and stuff costing money.view on HN →
This will always happen as long as people are led by their egos. Also they probably aren't autodidacts and don't understand learning for fun.view on HN →
This is a phenomenal example of exactly what I am advocating.Notice you didn't ask the AI to 'just design a stereo pedal for me.' You interrogated it, reasoned about netlists, and forced the concepts into your brain through intense friction. That is pure deep work.view on HN →
At some point this existential doubt about your own work and others seems pretty weird.Go ahead and figure out ways to interrogate on your work with technical means, that's a critical part of the process with an LLM or not.view on HN →
Yeah and frankly the innovation would occur irrespective of llm’s.Would it be harder? Sure. And perhaps the difficulty adds an additional cost of passion being a necessary condition to embark on the innovation. Passion leads to really good stuff.My personal fear is we get landfill sites of junk software produced. To some extent it should be costly to convert an idea to a concept - the cost being thinking carefully so what you put out there is somewhat legible.view on HN →
Also one of those with a mile-long ideas list that I can finally now burn through. I gotta say, it feels good!view on HN →
Here's your reminder that this is of course a bunch of alarmist nonsense, because as an issuer of currency the United States is incapable of becoming "insolvent."The authors are from an libertarian extremist think tank that pushes for a balanced budget amendment. If these people got their way, we would immediately solve the problem of people arguing about this on the internet since none of us would be able to afford to own a computer.view on HN →
There are far more divides than just that one.For instance, the ones that look at it from an economics perspective, security perspective, long term maintainability perspective and so on. For each of these there are pros and cons.view on HN →
Here's what I made:* https://www.stavros.io/posts/i-made-a-voice-note-taker/ - A voice note recorder.* https://github.com/skorokithakis/stavrobot - My secure AI personal assistant that's made my life admin massively easier.* https://github.com/skorokithakis/macropad - A macropad.* https://github.com/skorokithakis/sleight-of-hand - A clock that ticks seconds irregularly but is accurate for minutes.* https://pine.town - A whimsical little massively multiplayer drawing town.* https://encyclopedai.sview on HN →
To lay it out, Im pretty firmly pro-AI.Putting it succinctly, these kind of conversations feel weird because it's like asking whether carpenters are faster using power tools or hand tools. If you've used power tools it's obvious they make work a lot faster. Maybe there were some studies around the time power tools were introduced looking at the productivity of carpenters, if those studies had results saying the productivity gains weren't obvious in the data that means you have a problem with youview on HN →
I’m currently working across like 5 projects (was 4 last week but you know how it is). I now do more in days than others might in a week.Yesterday a colleague didn’t quite manage to implement a loading container with a Vue directive instead of DOM hacks, it was easier for me to just throw AI at the problem and produced a working and tested solution and developer docs than to have a similarly long meeting and have them iterate for hours.Then I got back to training a CNN to recognize crops from spview on HN →
> plagiarizedUnless you can point to specific works that something allegedly plagiarizes, the “plagiarism” allegation is meaningless.view on HN →
My latest game BossBattle[1] (html5, have a play) uses AI for graphics, some strobe effects, a C64 loading screen shader.I have decided to lean in to it and I will document all the places I use AI in the game on my blog[2]. Not everything works, notably 3D assets[3] and sound effects.There is a lot of human content… i paid for a lot out of my own pocket and have limited budget. It started in 2021 before chatgpt. LLMs cannot do everything and that’s not the purpose.Generative AI makes me as an soview on HN →
Thank you! That helped me understand. Hobbies that you regularly do, and an LLM is continuously helpful for, benefiting from memory.Personally, I would still be wary of the black box aspect -not knowing what it does remember and what it doesn't - so I would probably still use projects to make it more deterministic. But that's probably being overcautious and unnecessary in most common cases.view on HN →
PCB Tracer has a growing set of happy users. I think you will discover why, once you give it a try. The software has hundreds of convenient features and its active development continues. I've been building PCB Tracer mainly for fun and learning. It's certainly been a fun project! Hope you give it a try soon, find it useful and enjoy using it. -Philview on HN →
I admire Anthropic for sticking to their principles, even if it affects the bottom line. That’s the kind of company you want to work for.view on HN →
I see the chat, but it looks like you’re not actually considering using TTL anywhere, and ChatGPT isn’t giving any explanations about TTL?> I would definitely like to understand HCT vs HC (CMOS vs TTL) much better than I do, which currently isn't at all.I think what ChatGPT should have explained at the beginning is that both HCT and HC are CMOS logic families, it’s just that HCT is designed to interface with TTL (receive TTL signal levels as inputs). The outputs are the same (CMOS outputs are raview on HN →
And the entirety of OSS is hand waved away as an externality, but clearly there's something very powerful about all the sharing of models and knowledge going on that doesn't seem to be captured by traditional economic models (that I'm aware of).view on HN →
It is funny how "hardware design" is commonly used in the chip industry to describe what semiconductor design/verification engineers do. And then there's PCB designers using those same chips in their _hardware designs_.Also there's computer architects being like "So, are we hardware design? Interface design? Software? Something else?"...Meanwhile, all the mechanical engineers are looking from the outside saying "The slightest scratch and your 'hard'ware is dead. Not so 'hard' really, eh?" ;) ;)Eview on HN →
I mean, I've expanded what I use my programming skills for dramatically in the last year. I've suddenly got several personal macOS apps I'm building and maintaining for myself, for my small business, or for fun. That never happened before (I've generally been full stack on the web). I've built far more useful and complex firmware and finally begun designing and building custom circuits. I rarely had the time for that before.I'm able to take on way more interesting and challenging projects in myview on HN →
> We have found the god machine. It makes all human beings that don’t embrace it irrelevant, if you resist you will be swallowed by the void.Really? Can you show me something you’ve used it for?> You are nothing but a bully and an arse good day to you!view on HN →
I didn't say Mr. Johnny was hallucinating, or that he's lying. Was finding the "Written by humans" humorous the most polite comment ever? No, but it is absurd to call it harassment. Specially considering it matched his energy.His website is cool, and from what I could skim from the content I'm sure his clients are happy and find it worthwhile. I'm not being facetious. He said Claude saved him time, which is true. Regardless of that, I believe he wildly overestimated how much time it would've takview on HN →
It solves a CS problem called the Byzantine Generals problem. That problem was thought to have no solution before blockchains were created. The lack of CS knowledge on this board is pretty staggering sometimes.view on HN →
>... I was sure it was only good at autocomplete. Something happened earlier this year where the models hit a new level of capability.Yes, something happened, it got better at autocomplete. What else could be? The underlying model hasn't changed.>acceleration of the human racePlease just stop with this bullshit. Nobody's curing cancer, climate change, inequality or whatever important real problem there is with LLMs. Nobody.If this tech is good enough to make you more productive is just because yview on HN →
This is one of the pseudo-"arguments" I absolutely hate to read.The problem with America's healthcare is not the military, foreign aid or wars. It simply is not.The problem is the insane amount of waste in the US healthcare system. Y'all already spend much, much more per capita on healthcare than everyone else on earth by a wide margin [1], but get markedly lower returns in life expectancy [2].Y'all need to cut the waste and middlemen out of your healthcare system, take that money and invest itview on HN →
One of the things that honestly gets boring is this style of comment (typically European in origin but not always!). It does not constructively start any type discussion and just becomes a cheap shots style of argument.Every country and culture has its own pros/cons. I always think of the classic examples, Europe lacks a lot of innovation in business and that’s partly attributed to lack of free movement of labor (high layoff cost). Now we could argue to the end of time if that is good or bad andview on HN →
This is such a childish mindset. How much did you pay your plumber to fix your toilet last time? Why didn't you pay 40% more than that?view on HN →
Also just the sheer value of brute force.80 hours! 80 hours of just trying shit!view on HN →
No, you touch on the aspects where you're able to use AI as an extension of your skills.This is completely different than my colleague who isn't a software engineer, and now all of the sudden is creating PRs which I need to review and correct.I'm a sceptic. I use it to explore the unknowns and go from there.view on HN →
Okay, it's been several weeks.How much of what you did have you retained? Could you do all of, some of, a small fraction of, or none of the work again today if you had to?view on HN →
LLMs absolutely let you explore ideas and areas you wouldn't have otherwise...but does your new design actually _work_?I'm curious whether the "knowledge" you gained was real or hallucinatory. I've been using LLMs this way myself, but I worry I'm contaminating my memory with false information.view on HN →
>It's incredibly frustrating arguing these same points, over and over,quite frankly there seems to be something incredibly frustrating in your life going on, but I'm not sure that the underlying cause of whatever is weighing on your mind at the moment is that I asked "how do you know that what you are feeling is actually true, in comparison to what studies show should be true?" (rephrased, as not reasonable to quote whole post)>From our perspective, the gains are so obvious that it really does fview on HN →
> Nobody's sharing their work, because they used AI.Really. What a stupid statement. As if AI bros aren't screaming all over the internet telling people their vibe-coded projects.I do use AI for code, but I really don't know why AI users seem to have some sort of victim mentality when there are literally billions of capital stacking on their side.view on HN →
I mean AI art is for sure super samey and plagiarized and uninteresting stylisticallyIt's instantly recognizable and makes most indie games that disclose it just dead on arrivalview on HN →
i don’t like ai art bc it lacks and sort of “soul” or “human touch” (nebulous and subjective but iykyk) games are just another form of art, so why would i waste my time with just another form of slop?view on HN →
You don’t have to agree, but the actions are obvious:- Pentagon signed a contract for a technology they wanted- Pentagon found it useful- Pentagon wanted to apply it in more cases- supplier told the Pentagon no- Pentagon told the supplier to get bent, they’re legally required to in the USIf Anthropic doesn’t want the responsibilities of being a US company, they should exit the US; rather than having an entitled whine about how they want the privileges (access to capital, talent, etc) and none ofview on HN →
People just aren't buying them. They're about as affordable as any other hobby AFAIKview on HN →
equating a CNC router with Claude Code or Chat GPT is an egregious false equivalency.view on HN →
Can you actually provide any proof, even top-line stats from GitHub or other software forges that show the productivity boost you’re claiming?It’s not up to the skeptics to prove this tech doesn’t work, it’s up to the proponents to show it does and does so with a similar effect size as cigarettes cause lung cancer.There are a tremendous amount of LLM productivity stans on HN but the plural of anecdote is not data.Certainly these tools are useful, but the extent to which they are useful today isview on HN →
Hacker Smacker — Friend and foe writers on Hacker News